Why the study?
Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is closely related to CKD, but the long-term outcomes and effects of its improvement in CKD patients are not well understood.
Does persistent apparent treatment-resistant hypertension worsen renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Does persistent apparent treatment-resistant hypertension worsen renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Persistent apparent treatment-resistant hypertension over a two-year period is a significant independent risk factor for worse renal outcomes in patients with CKD, emphasizing the need for continuous blood pressure management.
Persistent ATRH was associated with CKD progression; leaves open whether sustained control alters outcomes in trials.
Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (ATRH) is closely related to chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, the long-term outcomes and the effects of improvement in ATRH in patients with CKD are not well understood. We evaluated the relationship between the persistence of ATRH and the progression of CKD. This cohort study enrolled 1921 patients with CKD. ATRH was defined as blood pressure above 140/90 mmHg and intake of three different types of antihypertensive agents, including diuretics, or intake of four or more different types of antihypertensive agents, regardless of blood pressure. We defined ATRH subgroups according to the ATRH status at the index year and two years later. The prevalence of ATRH at baseline was 14.0%. The presence of ATRH at both time points was an independent risk factor for end-point renal outcome (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04–1.92; p = 0.027). On the other hand, the presence of ATRH at any one of the time points was not statistically significant. In conclusion, persistent ATRH is more important for the prognosis of renal disease than the initial ATRH status. Continuous follow-up and appropriate treatment are important to improve the renal outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: