Key result
Refractory hypertension linked to ~73% greater renal risk versus treatment-resistant hypertension.
Why the study?
Treatment-resistant hypertension is associated with worse health outcomes, but no studies showed how health outcomes worsen upon progression to refractory hypertension.
Does refractory hypertension worsen long-term renal and cardiovascular outcomes compared to treatment-resistant hypertension in patients with chronic renal insufficiency?
Cohort (n=3,147)
Does refractory hypertension worsen long-term renal and cardiovascular outcomes compared to treatment-resistant hypertension in patients with chronic renal insufficiency?
Refractory hypertension is associated with significantly worse long-term renal and cardiovascular outcomes compared to treatment-resistant hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant enhanced renal surveillance in refractory hypertension; leaves open causal mechanisms and intervention effects in this observational cohort.
Refractory hypertension (RfH) is a severe phenotype of antihypertension treatment failure. Treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH), a less severe form of difficult-to-treat hypertension, has been associated with significantly worse health outcomes. However, no studies currently show how health outcomes may worsen upon progression to RfH. RfH and TRH were studied in 3147 hypertensive participants in the CRIC (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study). The hypertensive phenotype (ie, no TRH or RfH, TRH, or RfH) was identified at the baseline visit, and health outcomes were monitored at subsequent visits. Outcome risk was compared using Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates. A total of 136 (4.3%) individuals were identified with RfH at baseline. After adjusting for participant characteristics, individuals with RfH had increased risk for the composite renal outcome across all study years (50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate or end-stage renal disease; hazard ratio for study years 0-10=1.73 [95% CI, 1.42-2.11]) and the composite cardiovascular disease outcome during later study years (stroke, myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure; hazard ratio for study years 0-3=1.25 [0.91-1.73], for study years 3-6=1.50 [0.97-2.32]), and for study years 6-10=2.72 [1.47-5.01]) when compared with individuals with TRH. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between those with refractory versus TRH. We provide the first evidence that RfH is associated with worse long-term health outcomes compared with TRH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buhnerkempe et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Hypertension in chronic renal insufficiency (n=3,147). Refractory hypertension vs. Treatment-resistant hypertension was evaluated on Composite renal outcome (50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate or end-stage renal disease) (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.42-2.11). Refractory hypertension was associated with an increased risk of a composite renal outcome compared with treatment-resistant hypertension (HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.42-2.11).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: