Why the study?
Does CT screening identify additional abdominal aortic aneurysms in first-degree relatives of patients with multiplex abdominal aortic aneurysm families?
Does CT screening identify additional abdominal aortic aneurysms in first-degree relatives of patients with multiplex abdominal aortic aneurysm families?
Women from multiplex abdominal aortic aneurysm families are affected more often and at an older age, suggesting a strong need for targeted CT screening in this demographic.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CT screening may identify excess AAAs in multiplex families, especially women; leaves open whether targeted use improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Multiplex abdominal aortic aneurysm families (MAAAFs) (> or =1 subject plus the proband) represent 1% to 34% of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but the percentage in France is unknown. METHOD: The MAAAF rate was retrospectively defined by analysis of 3 groups: 72 of 104 consecutive individuals undergoing AAA surgery during 1994, 24 of 53 women and 35 of 76 men with giant (> or =9 cm) AAA operated on during 1986 to 1994. MAAAF characteristics were determined based on 10 families issued from these 3 groups and 34 others identified nationwide. Data were obtained from a standardized questionnaire for probands and relatives, detailed pedigrees of each family, and computed tomography (CT) scans without contrast medium of the aorta and lower limb arteries for first-degree relatives > or =40-year-of age. RESULTS: The MAAAF rate was 4.2% for the consecutive-surgery patients (proband M/F ratio, 17:1; mean age at surgery, 68.5 +/- 8.5 years). CT detected no additional AAA among them (screened individuals M/F ratio, 0.63; mean age, 54.0 +/- 11.2 years). MAAAF rates were 8.3% and 14.3% for the women's and giant-AAA groups with CT screening, respectively. Characteristics were investigated in 104 affected subjects from 44 MAAAFs: female relatives were more often affected than probands (P < 0.025). Compared with men, affected female relatives were significantly older at diagnosis and surgery (P < 0.05 and P < 0.02, respectively), as were affected women (P < 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively). CT scan screening identified significantly more AAA and abdominal aortic dilatations among the 44 MAAAFs than the consecutive-surgery group (5 and 4, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the MAAAF rate seems low in France, women from MAAAF were affected more often and later, suggesting that they should be screened.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hello et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: