Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intratracheal instillation of Sephadex particles is a convenient model for assessing the impact of potential anti-inflammatory compounds on lung eosinophilia thought to be a key feature in asthma pathophysiology. However, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms involved are poorly understood. We have studied the time course of Sephadex-induced lung eosinophilia, changes in pulmonary T cell numbers, and gene and protein expression as well as the immunological and pharmacological modulation of these inflammatory indices in the Sprague Dawley rat. Sephadex increased T cell numbers (including CD4(+) T cells) and evoked a pulmonary eosinophilia that was associated with an increase in gene/protein expression of the Th2-type cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and eotaxin in lung tissue. Sephadex instillation also induced airway hyperreactivity to acetylcholine and bradykinin. A neutralizing Ab (R73) against the alphabeta-TCR caused 54% depletion of total (CD2(+)) pulmonary T cells accompanied by a significant inhibition of IL-4, IL-13 and eotaxin gene expression together with suppression (65% inhibition) of eosinophils in lung tissue 24 h after Sephadex treatment. Sephadex-induced eosinophilia and Th2 cytokine gene and/or protein expression were sensitive to cyclosporin A and budesonide, compounds that inhibit T cell function, suggesting a pivotal role for T cells in orchestrating Sephadex-induced inflammation in this model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haddad et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: