While screening for hyperaldosteronism in general practice is possible in selected patients, systematic screening is hindered by the need for β-blocker cessation and organizational barriers.
ARR screening yields few confirmed hyperaldosteronism cases in resistant hypertension; leaves open feasibility of systematic primary care screening.
INTRODUCTION: Because hyperaldosteronism is the most common curable reason for secondary hypertension, screening is recommended. However, prevalence among general practice patients and feasibility of screening is still unclear. A design to assess prevalence in general practice and barriers against screening was created. METHODS: This was an open, observational pilot study and focus group. In 2 general practices, all patients with arterial hypertension were included. Those with resistant hypertension (>140/90 mm Hg and taking ≥3 antihypertensive drugs) were eligible for screening. The design and feasibility of the study were discussed in a focus group of experienced general practitioners. RESULTS: Of 3107 patients visiting the practices, 564 were diagnosed as having arterial hypertension. Seventy-nine fulfilled criteria for resistant hypertension. Aldosterone:renin ratio (ARR) could be measured in 63 of those patients. Withdrawal of ß-blocker was feasible in 34 of the 63 with measurable ARR. ARR was positive in 15, and in 3 of those 15 with positive ARR, it was caused by elevated aldosterone levels. Focus group discussion revealed barriers and concerns regarding organizational, financial, and practical aspects of a systematic screening. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for hyperaldosteronism in general practice seems possible in selected patients, but not in a systematic way. Barriers against systematic screening were a necessity for β-blocker cessation as well as structural prerequisites for patient identification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmiemann et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: