This essay uses a Burkean perspective to explore the ongoing debate over Truman's decision to use atomic weapons against Japan. Specifically, this critical nuclear analysis argues that a burlesque frame and entelechial forces pushed decision‐makers toward the tragedy of Hiroshima. This discussion takes issue with current revisionist discourse about the decision and shows how a rhetorical perspective can provide additional insight into the current debate.
Loading...
Bryan Hubbard (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: