Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rationale & Objective This review aims to synthesize the clinical translation landscape of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs), evaluating both their therapeutic potential and the practical challenges that affect their use in the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related anemia. Study Design Narrative review integrating findings from scientific literature and clinical trial data on HIF-PHIs. Setting & Participants The analysis includes agents approved for CKD-related anemia, those in ongoing clinical development, and candidates discontinued during trials. Exposure(s) The primary focus is HIF-PHIs, which stabilize HIF-α subunits and modulate the expression of downstream genes involved in erythropoiesis, iron metabolism, and other processes. Outcome(s) Key outcomes for each HIF-PHI include pharmacological characteristics, hemoglobin-raising efficacy, safety profiles, developmental status, and challenges encountered. Analytical Approach Qualitative analysis comparing and contrasting the properties, clinical progress, and lessons learned from different HIF-PHIs. Results The review summarizes currently approved HIF-PHIs, highlights promising agents in clinical development, and examines compounds that have been discontinued. It further analyzes the divergence between hemoglobin-raising efficacy and safety signals that have shaped regulatory decisions and influenced clinical guideline recommendations. Limitations As a narrative review, the conclusions are based on published data, may be subject to selection bias. In addition, limited or unpublished data, particularly for early-stage or discontinued agents, constrains the comprehensiveness of the analysis. Conclusions HIF-PHI represents a major therapeutic advancement, particularly for renal anemia. This review consolidates current knowledge, evaluates advantages alongside emerging safety concerns, and discusses the evolving role of HIF-PHIs in clinical practice guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fangyu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: