Limitations of Rate Response of an Activity‐Sensing Rate‐Responsive Pacemaker to Different Forms of Activity

The responses of an activity-sensing rate-responsive system (Activitrax) to various forms of physiological activity were assessed in 15 individuals who had this pacemaker. Nine were patients with complete heart block and atrial arrhythmias; their mean age was 60 years (range, 41-85 years). Six were age-matched healthy volunteers who were exercised with an external Activitrax system attached firmly to the chest wall. The pacemaker was programmed to achieve a pacing rate of about 100 bpm at the end of the first stage of the Bruce protocol (pacemaker settings: rate = 70-150 bpm; threshold = low to medium; response = 6-9). In the activity-sensing ventricular pacing mode, all patients achieved a significant increase in treadmill time compared to constant-rate ventricular pacing (mean +/- SD, 8.0 +/- 3.3 vs 5.4 +/- 2.3 minutes; p less than 0.01), with a mean maximum pacing rate of 123 +/- 18 bpm. Jogging in place produced a prompt increase in pacing rate, with the maximum achieved at the end of the exercise. However, physiological activities such as hand-grip, the Valsalva maneuver and standing resulted in only minimal rate response. Pacing rate after ascending 4 flights of stairs was the same as that achieved after descending the same stairs (100 +/- 8 vs 105 +/- 4 bpm; p = 0.1). All 15 subjects were exercised from resting heart rate for 3 minutes on a treadmill at 1.2 mph and 2.5 mph with four gradients at each speed. Although the pacing rate increased with a faster treadmill speed (p less than 0.005), it did not respond appropriately to a change in gradient compared to the sinus rate. We conclude that although activity-sensing rate-responsive pacing gives a prompt increase in pacing rate and improves maximum exercise tolerance, further refinement is necessary because: (1) physiological activities not associated with significant movement are not detected by this pacing system; (2) detection of vibrations as an indicator of activities does not correlate well with the level of exertion.