Why the study?
Does preoperative diastolic heart failure affect postoperative mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis compared to those with systolic dysfunction or normal function?
Does preoperative diastolic heart failure affect postoperative mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis compared to those with systolic dysfunction or normal function?
In patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, preoperative diastolic heart failure does not negatively affect postoperative survival, whereas systolic dysfunction is associated with poor outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low EF but not diastolic dysfunction signals higher post-AVR mortality risk in AS; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), the clinical outcome worsens after the development of angina, syncope, and heart failure. This study was performed to elucidate whether the outcome with AS was also poor in patients with diastolic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two patients who had undergone aortic valve replacement (AVR) for AS were retrospectively classified into 3 groups (G) on the basis of LV ejection fraction (EF) and pulmonary wedge pressure (PWP): G-1) normal LVEF, low PWP (EF > or = 45% and PWP < 16 mmHg; n = 35), G-2) normal LVEF, high PWP (EF > or = 45% and PWP > or = 16 mmHg; n = 8), and G-3) low LVEF (EF < 45%; n = 9). Among these 3 groups, we compared the outcome after AVR. None of the patients died after the operation in AS with preserved LVEF irrespective of the PWP, whereas there were 3 cardiac deaths in AS with low EF irrespective of the PWP. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AS, diastolic heart failure developed in addition to systolic heart failure. The development of LV systolic dysfunction in AS was regarded as poor during the postoperative course, but diastolic heart failure did not affect the outcome. The occurrence of heart failure with preserved systolic function may have a slightly better prognosis and may still be suitable for AVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakagawa et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: