Why the study?
While 2D strain is accurate using TTE, the value of adding 2D strain imaging to TEE for evaluating LV deformation in patients with cardiovascular diseases required evaluation.
Does 2D strain imaging using TEE provide comparable assessment of left ventricular deformation to TTE in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
Does 2D strain imaging using TEE provide comparable assessment of left ventricular deformation to TTE in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
TEE 2D strain imaging shows good agreement with TTE for longitudinal strain and can serve as an appropriate alternative for evaluating global LV deformation when TTE is inconclusive.
TTE 2D strain was more feasible than TEE; leaves open incremental value of TEE strain when TTE windows are inadequate.
BACKGROUND: 2D strain imaging has been proved as an accurate technique for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has become a standard and essential technique in clinical practice especially when TTE is inconclusive. Adding 2D strain imaging to TEE might be valuable in the evaluation of cardiac performance. The aim of the present study was to compare 2D strain imaging using TTE and TEE in the assessment of left ventricular deformation in patients with cardiovascular diseases. RESULTS: This study was conducted on sixty patients, who were referred for TEE for various clinical indications. All patients were examined with both TTE and TEE 2D strain imaging. Global and regional strain parameters including longitudinal (LS), circumferential (CS), and radial (RS) were examined. Analysis of 2D strain using TTE was time sparing than TEE (16 ± 1 vs 19 ± 2 min, P < 0.001). From 1020 segments explored using TTE, 97% (LS) and 93% (CS and RS) of the segments were fully analyzed versus 90% and 88% using TEE respectively (P < 0.01). TEE longitudinal strain has an excellent agreement with TTE-derived measurements and a modest agreement in circumferential strain but a notable disparity in radial strain values. Both regional and global LS and RS measured by TTE showed higher values (P < 0.01, < 0.03) compared with its corresponding values measured by TEE. Whereas segmental and global values of CS were higher using TTE modes, the difference with the analogous TEE values did not reach statistical significance. LS and CS measured by TTE and TEE showed excellent but similar correlation with LV EF and wall motion score index. CONCLUSION: 2D strain using TTE is user friendly compared to TEE. However, because of the good agreement, TEE 2D strain might represent an appropriate alternative in the evaluation of global LV deformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badran et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: