Why the study?
Does amiodarone use increase the risk of acute pulmonary toxicity in patients undergoing ICD implantation?
Does amiodarone use increase the risk of acute pulmonary toxicity in patients undergoing ICD implantation?
Amiodarone use prior to ICD implantation is associated with a significant risk of acute postoperative pulmonary toxicity (ARDS), resulting in prolonged ventilator dependence and ICU stays.
Amiodarone may raise postoperative ARDS risk and prolong ICU stay in ICD recipients; leaves open causality and relevance to contemporary practice.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)implantation is rapidly becoming accepted as primary therapy for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Many patients undergoing ICD implantation are on concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs to decrease shock frequency, slow tachycardia rate, and suppress supraventricular arrhythmias. Amiodarone is a potent antiarrhythmic agent that is also frequently used in the treatment of patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Ten to forty percent of patients undergoing ICD implantation will also be taking amiodarone. It has been reported to cause pulmonary toxicity in about 5% of patients per year. Acute amiodarone toxicity presenting as adult respiratory distress syndrome has been reported much less frequently. Although perioperative morbidity due to amiodarone has been described, the risk, predictability, and consequences of acute pulmonary toxicity from amiodarone in patients undergoing ICD implantation have not been previously described. We reviewed the records of 99 consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation at our institution from October 1987 to April 1992. Thirty‐nine patients were taking 480 ± 230 mg of amiodarone (median 400 mg, lower 20th percentile 400 mg, upper 80th percentile 800 mg)for 291 ± 554 days prior to ICD implantation. Ten patients taking amiodarone developed acute pulmonary toxicity clinically manifesting as diffuse pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiography and adult respiratory distress syndrome with hypoxia (arterial pO 2 < 60 mmHg)without evidence of pneumonia or elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCW ±15 mmHg). Of the 60 patients not taking amiodarone none developed adult respiratory distress syndrome. There was no relationship between the clinical variables of age, type of anesthesia, ejection fraction, dose or duration of amiodarone use, number of intraoperative ICD test shocks, operative time, or intraoperative FI O2 . Compared to patients on amiodarone who did not develop toxicity, patients with amiodarone pulmonary toxicity had prolonged intensive care unit stays (17.1 ± 16.9 days vs 3.5 ± 1.5 days, P < 0.001), as well as prolonged ventilator dependence (9.1 ± 18.7 days vs 0.9 ± 1.1 days. P = 0.02). Acute amiodarone pulmonary toxicity resulted in a widely variable clinical syndrome that occurred 1–5 days after surgery. In conclusion, pulmonary toxicity was not predicted by clinical orhemodynamic variables, results in markedly prolonged ventilator dependence and intensive care unit stays, and may result in death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hawthorne et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: