Why the study?
Does oral pilsicainide improve the restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Does oral pilsicainide improve the restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
A 2-week course of oral pilsicainide is moderately effective and well-tolerated for converting persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm compared to placebo.
Supports oral pilsicainide for sinus rhythm restoration in persistent AF; extends class Ic evidence to short-term outpatient regimens.
BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to determine the antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of oral pilsicainide, a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug, in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients (mean age, 58.9 years) with AF lasting >or=48 h and <or=6 months were randomized to receive pilsicainide 50 mg t.i.d. (n=58) or placebo (n=50) for 2 weeks in a double-blinded fashion. All patients underwent appropriate anticoagulation therapy with warfarin for >or=3 weeks prior to the study enrolment or after verification of the absence of left atrial thrombi by transesophageal echocardiography. After 2 weeks of treatment, an electrocardiogram was recorded to determine whether sinus rhythm was restored. Sinus rhythm was restored in 22.4% of patients treated with pilsicainide and in 2% treated with placebo (p=0.002). Cardioversion was less likely to occur with oral pilsicainide when the AF duration exceeded 2 months or if the left atrial diameter exceeded 45 mm. There was no significant difference in the adverse cardiovascular event rate between the pilsicainide- and placebo-treated groups. One patient in the pilsicainide group developed an atrial flutter without any hemodynamic deterioration. CONCLUSION: A 2-week oral administration of pilsicainide is well tolerated and moderately effective in converting persistent AF into sinus rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okishige et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: