Why the study?
Does remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation improve outcomes or reduce fluoroscopy time compared to manual ablation in adult patients with congenital heart disease and SVT?
Population
116 adult patients with congenital heart disease undergoing 154 supraventricular tachycardia ablation…
Comparison
Remote magnetic navigation-guided… vs Manual mapping/ablation.
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 20-months
Authors
Loading...
RMN may facilitate low-fluoroscopy SVT ablation in complex ACHD; extends observational data but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Does remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation improve outcomes or reduce fluoroscopy time compared to manual ablation in adult patients with congenital heart disease and SVT?
Remote magnetic navigation combined with 3D-image integration enables safe and effective SVT ablation with very low fluoroscopy exposure in adult congenital heart disease patients, even those with complex anatomy and difficult access.
Ueda et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: