Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the B.Well PRO-33 oscillometric device for professional office blood pressure measurement on the upper arm according to ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 2:2024 standards.
Does the B.Well PRO-33 oscillometric device accurately measure blood pressure compared to reference aneroid sphygmomanometers in the general population?
Does the B.Well PRO-33 oscillometric device accurately measure blood pressure compared to reference aneroid sphygmomanometers in the general population?
The B.Well PRO-33 oscillometric blood pressure monitor meets ISO accuracy standards and is recommended for clinical use in the general population.
May support B.Well PRO-33 if validated; leaves open its accuracy for office BP measurement under updated ISO standards.
We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of B.Well PRO-33 (B.Well, Widnau, Switzerland) oscillometric device for professional office measurement of blood pressure (BP) on the upper arm in the general population in accordance with the Amendment 2.2024-01 of the Standard 81060-2:2018 by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 2:2024). Study participants were recruited according to the age, gender, BP, and cuff distribution requirements of the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 2:2024 in the general population using the sequential BP measurement method on the same arm. The test device was used with one universal cuff for arm circumferences of 22-42 cm. We chose aneroid sphygmomanometers Riester Big Ben Square Desk (Rudolf Riester, Jungingen, Germany) with small, medium and large cuffs and Welch Allyn 767 Desk (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY, USA) with a large adult cuff for arm circumferences of 22-37 and 38-42 cm, respectively, as control devices. We enrolled 112 study subjects, of whom 85 were analyzed. For validation criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the differences between the readings of the tested device and reference BP (systolic/diastolic; threshold ≤5 ± 8 mmHg; N = 255) was 1.7 ± 5.4/1.8 ± 5.7 mmHg. For validation criterion 2, the SD of the mean BP difference between the tested device and reference BP readings per subject (systolic/diastolic; threshold ≤ 6.73/6.71 mmHg; N = 85) was 4.7/4.7 mmHg. B.Well PRO-33 professional office BP monitor met the requirements of the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 2:2024 for the general population, and therefore can be recommended for clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Posnenkova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: