Why the study?
Do group-mediated cognitive-behavioral interventions for weight loss and physical activity improve self-efficacy and satisfaction in older, obese adults in poor cardiovascular health?
Do group-mediated cognitive-behavioral interventions for weight loss and physical activity improve self-efficacy and satisfaction in older, obese adults in poor cardiovascular health?
Group-mediated cognitive-behavioral interventions combining weight loss and physical activity improve self-efficacy and satisfaction with function in older, obese adults with poor cardiovascular health.
Supports incorporating group-mediated cognitive-behavioral interventions into care for older obese adults with poor cardiovascular health; extends RCT evidence on psychosocial outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The study objectives were to determine (a) the effects of group-mediated cognitive-behavioral interventions on change in performance self-efficacy, satisfaction with function, and with appearance among older, overweight/obese adults in poor cardiovascular health and (b) whether self-efficacy mediated change in 400-m walk time. METHODS: This translational, randomized controlled trial of physical activity and weight loss was conducted within community Cooperative Extension Centers. Participants were randomized to three intervention arms: Physical Activity, Weight Loss + Physical Activity, or a Successful Aging education control. RESULTS: Across 18 months, the Weight Loss + Physical Activity intervention demonstrated greater improvements in self-efficacy, satisfaction with function, and appearance versus other trial arms. Physical Activity intervention participants also experienced significant improvements in self-efficacy and satisfaction with function versus those in Successful Aging. Self-efficacy mediated 400-m walk time at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Both group-mediated cognitive-behavioral interventions yielded desirable improvements in social cognitions and preserved mobility improvements post-intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brawley et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: