Why the study?
Giant cell myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis have poor prognoses, but their echocardiographic appearance had not been systematically studied despite echocardiography being the first-line diagnostic tool.
Does echocardiography differentiate between giant cell myocarditis, cardiac sarcoidosis, and acute non-fulminant myocarditis?
Does echocardiography differentiate between giant cell myocarditis, cardiac sarcoidosis, and acute non-fulminant myocarditis?
Echocardiography identifies more severe LV and RV dysfunction in giant cell myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis compared to acute non-fulminant myocarditis, aiding in the early suspicion of these high-risk conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Echocardiography may help differentiate GCM/CS from ANFM at presentation; leaves open reliable distinction between the two without biopsy.
Background: Giant cell myocarditis (GCM) and cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are, in contrast to acute non-fulminant myocarditis (ANFM), rare inflammatory diseases of the myocardium with poor prognosis. Although echocardiography is the first-line diagnostic tool in these patients, their echocardiographic appearance has so far not been systematically studied. Methods: We assessed a total of 71 patients with endomyocardial biopsy-proven GCM (n = 21), and CS (n = 25), as well as magnetic resonance-verified ANFM (n = 25). All echocardiographic examinations, performed upon clinical presentation, were reanalysed according to current guidelines including a detailed assessment of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Results: 8%), had more severe clinical symptoms and higher natriuretic peptide levels. For both GCM and CS, echocardiography revealed more frequently signs of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in form of a reduced ejection fraction (p < 0.001), decreased cardiac index (p < 0.001) and lower global longitudinal strain (p < 0.001) in contrast to ANFM. The most prominent increase in LV end-diastolic volume index was observed in CS. In addition, RV dysfunction was more frequently found in both GCM and CS than in ANFM (p = 0.042). Conclusions: Both GCM and CS have an echocardiographic and clinical appearance that is distinct from ANFM. However, the method cannot further differentiate between the two rare entities. Consequently, echocardiography can strengthen the initial clinical suspicion of a more severe form of myocarditis, thus warranting a more rigorous clinical work-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bobbio et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: