Why the study?
Does video-assisted bilateral radiofrequency ablation prevent atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with lone atrial fibrillation?
Does video-assisted bilateral radiofrequency ablation prevent atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with lone atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Minimally invasive bilateral thoracoscopic radiofrequency ablation for lone atrial fibrillation is safe and highly effective, particularly for paroxysmal and persistent AF.
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: We present our results with minimally invasive surgical treatment of lone atrial fibrillation (LAF) employing a radiofrequency (RF) source through a bilateral thoracoscopy. METHODS: Between January 2007 and January 2011, 28 consecutive patients (85.7% male, mean age 67.1 ± 9.1 years) with LAF underwent video-assisted bilateral RF ablation. Fourteen patients (50%) had paroxysmal, five (17.8%) persistent, and nine (32.2%) long-persistent LAF. All patients were followed-up according to the Heart Rhythm Society/ European Heart Rhythm Association/European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (HRS/EHRA/ECA) and success/failure was reported as suggested by Society of Thoracic Surgeon (STS) guidelines. Mean follow-up was 27.8 ± 8.6 months. RESULTS: Time-related prevalence of postoperative AF was 4.5% at 36 months. Success was much more likely in subjects with paroxysmal (3-year prevalence, 0%) or persistent (3-year prevalence, 0%) than long-standing persistent LAF (3-year prevalence, 8.3%). At 36 months the estimated prevalence of antiarrhythmic drugs was 11.3% (8.8 to 13.7). No major thromboembolic events were detected during the follow-up period and 36-month prevalence of Warfarin use was 15.2% (11.5 to 18.1). Finally, no patient underwent electrical cardioversion. CONCLUSIONS: This approach yielded satisfactory results with a high degree of safety. Further larger studies are necessary to confirm our findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meir et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: