Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We argue that the model developed in Epstein et al.'s target article does not explain differences between child first language (LI) acquisition and adult second language (L2) acquisition. We therefore sketch an alternative view, originally developed in Clahsen and Muysken (1989), in the light of new empirical findings and theoretical developments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clahsen et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: