Why the study?
Does left ventricular lead positioning on epicardial scar increase the risk of CRT-induced proarrhythmia, and can it be managed by catheter ablation?
Does left ventricular lead positioning on epicardial scar increase the risk of CRT-induced proarrhythmia, and can it be managed by catheter ablation?
CRT-induced proarrhythmia is associated with left ventricular lead placement on epicardial scar and can be successfully managed with catheter ablation, allowing for the resumption of biventricular pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant avoiding epicardial scar for LV leads; leaves open whether ablation safely restores biventricular pacing.
BACKGROUND: The mechanism of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-induced proarrhythmia remains unknown. We postulated that pacing from a left ventricular (LV) lead positioned on epicardial scar can facilitate re-entrant ventricular tachycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between CRT-induced proarrhythmia and LV lead location within scar. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-eight epicardial and 63 endocardial maps, obtained from 64 CRT patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation, were analyzed. A positive LV lead/scar relationship, defined as a lead tip positioned on scar/border zone, was determined by overlaying fluoroscopic projections with LV electroanatomical maps. CRT-induced proarrhythmia occurred in 8 patients (12.5%). They all presented early with electrical storm (100% versus 39% of patients with no proarrhythmia; P<0.01), requiring temporary biventricular pacing discontinuation in half of cases. They more frequently presented with heart failure/cardiogenic shock (50% versus 7%; P<0.01), requiring intensive care management. Ventricular tachycardia was re-entrant in all. The LV lead location within epicardial scar was significantly more frequent in the proarrhythmia group (60% versus 9% P=0.03 on epicardial bipolar scar, 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on epicardial unipolar scar, and 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on any-epicardial scar). Ablation was performed within epicardial scar, close to the LV lead, and allowed CRT reactivation in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: CRT-induced proarrhythmia presented early with electrical storm and was associated with an LV lead positioning within epicardial scar. Catheter ablation allowed for resumption of biventricular stimulation in all patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roque et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: