Why the study?
Whether the inferior ability of atenolol to reduce central compared to peripheral blood pressure relates to heart rate-dependent, heart rate-independent effects, or both was unclear.
Does atenolol affect systolic blood pressure amplification differently than nebivolol or ivabradine in patients with sick sinus syndrome and a pacemaker?
Does atenolol affect systolic blood pressure amplification differently than nebivolol or ivabradine in patients with sick sinus syndrome and a pacemaker?
Atenolol's inferior ability to reduce central versus peripheral blood pressure is explained by a combination of its heart rate-dependent and -independent effects.
Atenolol's central BP inferiority arises from combined HR-dependent and -independent effects; extends mechanistic insights in sick sinus syndrome but leaves practice implications open pending larger trials.
OBJECTIVE: Whether the inferior ability of atenolol to reduce central (aortic) compared to peripheral (brachial) blood pressure (BP) is related to its heart rate (HR)-dependent or -independent effects, or their combination, remains unclear. To provide further mechanistic insight into this topic, we studied the acute effects of atenolol versus nebivolol and ivabradine on systolic blood pressure amplification (SBPA; peripheral systolic BP minus central systolic BP) in a model of sick sinus syndrome patients with a permanent dual-chamber cardiac pacemaker in a nonrandomized single-blind single-group clinical trial. METHODS: We determined hemodynamic indices noninvasively (Sphygmocor XCEL) before and at least 3 h after administration of oral atenolol 50 or 100 mg, nebivolol 5 mg, or ivabradine 5 or 7.5 mg during atrial pacing at a low (40 bpm), middle (60 bpm), and high (90 bpm) HR level in 25 participants (mean age 65.5 years, 12 men). RESULTS: = 0.028)), indicating inferior central vs peripheral systolic BP change. However, we observed no significant change in SBPA with atenolol at the middle and high HR levels, i.e., when HR-dependent mechanisms had been eliminated by pacing. CONCLUSION: The findings of our trial with a mechanistic approach to the topic imply that the inferior ability of atenolol to reduce central vs peripheral BP can be explained by the combination of its heart rate-dependent and -independent effects. This trial is registered with NCT03245996.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teeäär et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: