This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Transition-metal-doped α -MnO 2 catalysts (Ni, Cu, Fe at 10 at%) were synthesized by a facile hydrothermal method and evaluated as bifunctional electrocatalysts for rechargeable zinc–air batteries (ZABs). Fe–MnO 2 exhibited the best bifunctional activity, with the most positive oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) onset potential (0.895 V vs RHE), lowest oxygen evolution reaction (OER) overpotential (510 mV at 10 mA cm −2 ), and smallest ORR/OER potential gap (Δ E = 0.964 V). Electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) normalization revealed that Fe–MnO 2 achieves an optimal balance between intrinsic per-site activity and active-site density, surpassing both undoped α -MnO 2 (high intrinsic activity but limited ECSA) and Cu–/Ni–MnO 2 (high ECSA but low intrinsic activity). In full ZAB cells at 10 mA cm −2 , Fe–MnO 2 cycled stably for 900 cycles with a charge–discharge voltage gap of only 0.81 → 0.97 V, comparable to undoped α -MnO 2 (0.75 → 1.05 V) and substantially smaller than those of Cu–MnO 2 (→1.32 V) and Ni–MnO 2 (→1.58 V). Under more demanding conditions (50 mA cm −2 , 200 cycles), Fe–MnO 2 sustained stable cycling (1.23 → 1.78 V), whereas undoped α -MnO 2 degraded rapidly beyond ∼50 cycles (1.42 → 2.39 V), attributed to Jahn–Teller-driven phase transformation. Post-cycling x-ray absorption spectroscopy linear combination fitting confirmed preserved MnO 2 -like character in Fe–MnO 2 , whereas α -MnO 2 , Cu–MnO 2 , and Ni–MnO 2 showed phase conversion (∼80% → ∼ 60%, ∼70% → ∼ 20%, and ∼80% → ∼ 60%, respectively, after 10 mA cm −2 cycling). Density functional theory calculations revealed that interstitial Fe doping reduces Mn 3+ e g orbital splitting by 46%, suppressing Jahn–Teller distortion, and shifts the binding energies of *OOH, *O, and *OH toward the optimal range, establishing Fe–MnO 2 as a promising earth-abundant bifunctional catalyst for practical ZABs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soonthornkit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: