Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a case study of Amnesty International's relationship with the British Government. It demonstrates that Amnesty has a close working relationship with the Foreign Office over human rights violations abroad but is excluded from policy formation with regard to human rights in Britain. The differential treatment accorded to this legitimate group within different policy networks is discussed with regard to pluralist and state autonomy theories. It concludes that present accounts of pluralism cannot be empirically differentiated from reasonable theories of state autonomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christiansen et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: