Why the study?
Does the WHO EPI schedule of IPV administration result in different seroconversion rates compared to the US schedule in infants?
Does the WHO EPI schedule of IPV administration result in different seroconversion rates compared to the US schedule in infants?
The WHO EPI schedule for IPV administration resulted in significantly lower seroconversion rates for poliovirus types 1 and 2 compared to the US schedule in infants in Puerto Rico.
May warrant preference for US-like IPV schedules; challenges WHO EPI equivalence and extends schedule optimization trials.
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the discontinuation of oral poliovirus vaccine after eradication of wild poliovirus. Studies assessing inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) immunogenicity in tropical countries, using the WHO Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) schedule, have been limited. METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial in Ponce, Puerto Rico. Infants were assigned to 1 of 2 study arms: those in the EPI arm received IPV at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age, and those in the US arm received IPV at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. Neutralizing antibody titers against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 were tested on serum specimens obtained before administration of the first dose of IPV and 28-45 days after administration of the last dose of IPV. RESULTS: Seroconversion rates for the EPI (n=225) and US (n=230) arms, respectively, were 85.8% and 99.6% for poliovirus type 1 (P<.001), 86.2% and 100% for poliovirus type 2 (P<.001), and 96.9% and 99.1% for poliovirus type 3 (P=.08). Seroconversion rates were lower among infants in the EPI arm who had high maternal antibody levels for all 3 poliovirus types (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The EPI schedule resulted in lower seroconversion rates for poliovirus types 1 and 2. These results are relevant for tropical countries planning to use IPV in a posteradication environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dayan et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: