Why the study?
Does periprocedural DOAC management prevent thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients undergoing electrophysiologic procedures?
Does periprocedural DOAC management prevent thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients undergoing electrophysiologic procedures?
This review provides an overview of best practices for managing DOACs during electrophysiological procedures to balance bleeding and thromboembolic risks.
Limited DOAC guidance in EP procedures warrants caution; leaves open optimal periprocedural strategies.
As direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety outcomes compared with vitamin K antagonists for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism and the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, their role in the management of anticoagulation during electrophysiological procedures continues to evolve. At present, guidelines are limited regarding specific recommendations for the use of DOACs in these clinical settings. Here, we review available data regarding the risks and benefits associated with various periprocedural anticoagulation management approaches when patients receiving DOACs undergo electrophysiologic procedures including cardioversion, ablation, and device implantation. This discussion is intended to provide clinicians with an overview of available evidence and best practices to minimize the risk of both thromboembolic and bleeding events in the periprocedural setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finks et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: