Why the study?
Do ECG changes during adenosine stress predict reversible perfusion defects on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
Do ECG changes during adenosine stress predict reversible perfusion defects on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
ST-depression during adenosine stress testing has high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting reversible myocardial perfusion defects, meriting critical evaluation when present.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adenosine-induced ECG changes may aid ischemia detection on MPS; leaves open need for outcome validation before protocol changes.
OBJECTIVE: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is a valuable, noninvasive imaging modality in the evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease. Adenosine stress may occasionally be associated with ECG changes. This study evaluated the strength of association between adenosine stress-related ECG changes and perfusion defects on Tc-MPS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 117 (mean age: 61.25±9.27 years; sex: men 87, women 30) patients with known/suspected coronary artery disease underwent adenosine stress MPS. ECG was monitored continuously during adenosine stress for ST-depression. On the basis of the summed difference score, reversible perfusion defects were categorized as follows: normal: less than 4, mild: 4-8, moderate: 9-13, and severe: more than 13. RESULTS: ST-depression was observed in 27/117 (23.1%) and reversible perfusion defects were observed in 18/27 (66.66%) patients. 2/27, 6/27, and 10/27 patients had mild, moderate, and severe ischemia, respectively. 9/27 patients had normal perfusion. ECG changes and perfusion defects showed a moderate strength of association (correlation coefficient r=0.35, P=0.006). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ECG findings for prediction of ischemia were 35.29, 86.36, 67.67, and 63.33%, respectively. CONCLUSION: ECG changes during adenosine stress are not uncommon. It shows a moderate strength of association with reversible perfusion defects. ECG changes during adenosine merit critical evaluation of MPS findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taywade et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: