Anesthesia outside the operating room carries specific risks that require adherence to operating room standards, including full oxygenation and end-tidal CO2 monitoring, to ensure patient safety.
Observational data warrant caution in office anesthesia; leaves open whether randomized trials will validate monitoring standards.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to define risks for anesthesia and sedation outside the operating room, and to suggest how to prevent these risks and maintain quality of care. RECENT FINDINGS: There are no recent data on risk for anesthesia outside the operating room, except information derived from the American Society of Anesthesia Closed Claims project, which indicates there is a higher risk for office-based anesthesia. SUMMARY: Complications of anesthesia outside the operating room are not well studied, although a few closed claims are appearing in the literature suggesting there is a higher risk. Topics discussed focus on MRI and surgical procedures, principally dental, plastic, and gastrointestinal endoscopy. Risk factors for these procedures are identified and quantified and measures to reduce them discussed, with emphasis on full oxygenation and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring. Nonoperating room anesthesia requires skills, experience and organization. Quality can only be assured by ensuring all alternative locations adhere to operating room standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
C Melloni (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: