Why the study?
Previous 7-day trials of statins showed conflicting results on emotional processing, suggesting that longer administration in individuals predisposed to depression may be needed to observe positive effects.
Does 28-day simvastatin administration improve emotional processing in healthy volunteers at risk for depression owing to loneliness?
Does 28-day simvastatin administration improve emotional processing in healthy volunteers at risk for depression owing to loneliness?
This protocol outlines a remote experimental medicine trial to test whether 28-day simvastatin administration improves emotional processing and reward learning in healthy volunteers at risk for depression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No benefit on emotional processing or cognition in at-risk volunteers; leaves open antidepressant effects in depressed patients.
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests inflammation may be a key mechanism by which psychosocial stress, including loneliness, predisposes to depression. Observational and clinical studies have suggested simvastatin, with its anti-inflammatory properties, may have a potential use in the treatment of depression. Previous experimental medicine trials investigating 7-day use of statins showed conflicting results, with simvastatin displaying a more positive effect on emotional processing compared with atorvastatin. It is possible that statins require longer administration in predisposed individuals before showing the expected positive effects on emotional processing. AIMS: Here, we aim to test the neuropsychological effects of 28-day simvastatin administration versus placebo, in healthy volunteers at risk for depression owing to loneliness. METHOD: This is a remote experimental medicine study. One hundred participants across the UK will be recruited and randomised to either 28-day 20 mg simvastatin or placebo in a double-blind fashion. Before and after administration, participants will complete an online testing session involving tasks of emotional processing and reward learning, processes related to vulnerability to depression. Working memory will also be assessed and waking salivary cortisol samples will be collected. The primary outcome will be accuracy in identifying emotions in a facial expression recognition task, comparing the two groups across time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waters et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: