Why the study?
Does the fixed-dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone reduce systolic blood pressure more than monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension?
Does the fixed-dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone reduce systolic blood pressure more than monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension?
The fixed-dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone provides significantly greater blood pressure reduction than either monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension, though with higher rates of creatinine elevation.
Supports azilsartan/chlorthalidone FDC over monotherapy for greater SBP reduction in stage 2 hypertension; confirms additive effects in this RCT.
This study compared the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of the angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) and the thiazide-like diuretic chlorthalidone (CLD) with the individual monotherapies in a double-blind factorial study. A total of 1714 patients with clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) 160 mm Hg to 190 mm Hg inclusive were randomized to AZL-M 0 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg and/or chlorthalidone 0 mg, 12.5 mg, or 25 mg. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline to 8 weeks in trough (hour 22-24) SBP by ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM). Patients' mean age was 57 years; 47% were men and 20% were black. Baseline trough BP was approximately 165/95 mm Hg and 151/91 mm Hg by clinic and ABPM measurements, respectively. For the pooled AZL-M/CLD 40/25-mg and 80/25-mg FDC groups, SBP reduction by ABPM at trough was 28.9 mm Hg and exceeded AZL-M 80 mg and CLD 25 mg monotherapies by 13.8 mm Hg and 13 mm Hg, respectively (P<.001 for both comparisons). Discontinuation rates and elevations in serum creatinine were dose-dependent and occurred more often in the AZL-M/CLD groups. In patients with stage 2 hypertension, treatment with the combination of AZL-M and CLD resulted in substantially greater SBP reduction compared with either agent alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sica et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: