Key result
Cardiometabolic health education slightly lowers short-term weight by ~0.2 kg in populations with lower education.
Why the study?
Do cardiometabolic health education interventions improve cardiometabolic outcomes in populations with lower educational attainment?
Meta-Analysis
Do cardiometabolic health education interventions improve cardiometabolic outcomes in populations with lower educational attainment?
Mean Difference: -0.2 (95% CI -0.35–-0.06)
p-value: p=0.007
Cardiometabolic education interventions improve short-term risk factors in populations with lower educational attainment, but these benefits are not sustained at 1 to 2 years.
BACKGROUND: Health education is integral to cardiometabolic disease (CMD) management. Certain populations, such as people with lower educational attainment have higher risk of CMD and worse outcomes. They are also known to have differing preferences for health education formats and delivery compared with the general population. This study assessed the efficacy of CMD educational interventions in populations with lower educational attainment. METHODS: Four databases (Medline, Proquest, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) were systematically searched to identify studies using an educational intervention, targeting CMD-related outcomes, in a population with low educational attainment, in a community or primary care setting. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled mean differences. RESULTS: ; p < 0.001), weight (-0.20 [-0.35, -0.06] kg; p = 0.007), % fat in diet (-2.45 [-3.08, -1.81]; p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (-0.51 [-0.98, -0.05] mmHg; p = 0.031), total cholesterol (-0.54 [-0.70, -0.38] mg/dL; p < 0.001), HbA1c (-0.46 [-0.74, -0.17] %; p = 0.002), physical activity (1.04 [0.43, 1.66] hours/week; p < 0.001), and CES depression score (-0.72 [-1.16, -0.27]; 0.002). However, where 12 or 24 month follow-up data were available, there were no statistically significant differences compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: CMD education interventions can improve multiple outcomes in the short term in people with lower educational attainment. Further work is needed around how such benefits may be maintained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woolley et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiometabolic disease. Cardiometabolic health education interventions vs. Baseline/Control was evaluated on Weight (MD -0.20 kg, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.06, p=0.007). Cardiometabolic health education interventions in populations with lower educational attainment significantly improved short-term outcomes including weight (MD -0.20 kg; 95% CI -0.35 to -0.06; p=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: