Why the study?
Ultrasound-based local pulse wave velocity can be estimated using fast focused imaging or plane wave imaging, but their in vivo accuracy had not been directly compared.
Does fast focused imaging compared to plane wave imaging provide similar accuracy for in vivo pulse wave velocity estimation in healthy volunteers?
Does fast focused imaging compared to plane wave imaging provide similar accuracy for in vivo pulse wave velocity estimation in healthy volunteers?
Both fast focused imaging and plane wave imaging are equally suitable for in vivo pulse wave velocity estimation in clinical practice, with a preference for estimation at the dicrotic notch due to higher R2 values.
Ultrasound-based local pulse wave velocity (PWV) estimation, as a measure of arterial stiffness, can be based on fast focused imaging (FFI) or plane wave imaging (PWI). This study was aimed at comparing the accuracy of in vivo PWV estimation using FFI and PWI. Ultrasound radiofrequency data of carotid arteries were acquired in 14 healthy volunteers (25-57 y) by executing the FFI (12 lines, 7200 Hz) and PWI (128 lines, 2000 Hz) methods consecutively. PWV was derived at two time-reference points, dicrotic notch (DN) and systolic foot (SF), for multiple pressure cycles by fitting a linear function through the positions of the peaks of low-pass filtered wall acceleration curves as a function of time. The accuracy of PWV estimation was determined for various cutoff frequencies (10-200 Hz). No statistically significant difference was observed between PWVs estimated by both approaches. The PWV and R2 at DN were higher, on average, than those at SF (PWV/R2: FFI SF 5.5/0.92, FFI DN 6.1/0.92; PWI SF 5.4/0.89, PWI DN 6.3/0.95). The use of cutoff frequencies between 40 and 80 Hz provided the most accurate PWVs. Both methods seemed equally suitable for use in clinical practice, although we have a preference for the PWV at DN given the higher R2 values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steeg et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: