Key result
Measuring local pulse wave velocity using the dicrotic notch (PWVdn) yielded better intra-individual variability (0.6 vs 1.1 m/s) and discriminated between age groups (P<0.0001) compared to PWVsf.
Why the study?
Does using the dicrotic notch as a time-reference point for local pulse wave velocity improve the measurement of arterial stiffness compared to the systolic foot in young and older participants?
Cross-Sectional
Does using the dicrotic notch as a time-reference point for local pulse wave velocity improve the measurement of arterial stiffness compared to the systolic foot in young and older participants?
Using the dicrotic notch rather than the systolic foot as a time-reference point for local pulse wave velocity provides a more reproducible and discriminative noninvasive measure of arterial stiffness.
May improve local PWV reproducibility; leaves open clinical adoption pending validation studies.
OBJECTIVES: Increased arterial stiffness is associated with cardiovascular disease. Its applicability in individual patient management, however, is limited due to lack of reliable methods. We developed a method to measure arterial stiffness by means of local pulse wave velocity (PWV), using multiple M-mode ultrasound and the dicrotic notch (PWVdn) rather than the systolic foot (PWVsf) as time-reference point. METHODS: Systolic foot and dicrotic notch were determined in 14 simultaneously recorded distension waveforms obtained in young and older participants (mean age 26 and 59 years). Linear regression was performed on echo-line position and time-reference point, resulting in a local PWV estimate, either PWVsf or PWVdn. RESULTS: PWVdn, at about mean arterial pressure, had a better intra-individual variability (0.6 m/s) than PWVsf (1.1 m/s). The expected difference in stiffness between the two age categories was identified by PWVdn (P < 0.0001), but not by PWVsf. Moreover, in contrast to PWVsf, PWVdn showed a significant correlation with relative distension (r = 0.56) and the local distensibility coefficient (r = 0.52). CONCLUSION: PWVdn is a noninvasive and suitable measure of arterial stiffness: it has a good reproducibility, discriminates well between age groups, and correlates with local distensibility. PWVdn does not require additional assessment of distance or local pulse pressure. Furthermore, PWVdn is measured locally, at near-mean arterial pressure, thereby better reflecting the effective arterial stiffness, which determines the load the left ventricle is subjected to as it ejects blood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hermeling et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Arterial stiffness. Local pulse wave velocity measurement using the dicrotic notch (PWVdn) vs. Measurement using the systolic foot (PWVsf) was evaluated on Intra-individual variability (m/s). Measuring local pulse wave velocity using the dicrotic notch (PWVdn) yielded better intra-individual variability (0.6 vs 1.1 m/s) and discriminated between age groups (P<0.0001) compared to PWVsf.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: