Population-based cohort study reveals a three- to sevenfold increased mortality risk following Clostridioides difficile infection, highlighting the severe burden of this enteric pathogen.
OBJECTIVES: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common healthcare-associated infection and leading cause of gastroenteritis-related mortality worldwide. However, data on CDI-associated mortality are scarce. We aimed to examine the association between CDI and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. We additionally explored contributing causes of mortality, including recurrent CDI, hospital- or community-acquired CDI, chronic comorbidities, and age. METHODS: This nationwide population-based cohort study (from 2006 to 2019) compared individuals with CDI with the entire Swedish background population using standardized mortality ratios. In addition, a matched-cohort design (1:10), utilizing multivariable Poisson-regression models, provided incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: This study included 43 150 individuals with CDI and 355 172 controls. In total, 69.7% were ≥65 years, and 54.9% were female. CDI was associated with a 3- to 7-fold increased mortality rate (IRR = 3.5, 95% CI: 3.3-3.6; standardized mortality ratio = 6.8, 95% CI: 6.7-6.9) compared with the matched controls and Swedish background population, respectively. Mortality rates were highest for hospital-acquired CDI (IRR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.9-3.2) and during the first CDI episode (IRR = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.2-0.3 for recurrent versus first CDI). Individuals with CDI had more chronic comorbidities than controls, yet mortality remained higher among CDI cases even after adjustment and stratification for comorbidity; CDI was associated with increased mortality (IRR = 6.1, 95% CI: 5.5-6.8), particularly among those without any chronic comorbidities. DISCUSSION: CDI was associated with elevated all-cause and cause-specific mortality, despite possible confounding by ill health. Mortality rates were consistently increased across sexes, all age groups, and comorbidity groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boven et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: