Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have determined, for the first time, the potency of a new ETA-selective endothelin (ET) antagonist, PD155080, for human endothelin receptors. In sections of human left ventricle (n = 3) and human kidney (n = 5) PD155080 competed for specific [125I]ET-1 binding with Kd values at the ETA receptor of 221.4 +/- 25 nM and 19.0 +/- 23 nM and at the ETB receptor of 86.5 +/- 9.0 microM and 17.7 +/- 1.4 microM. PD155080 therefore has up to 1,000-fold selectivity for the human ETA receptor. The ability of this compound to antagonize ET-1-mediated vasoconstriction was determined in human isolated coronary artery, saphenous vein, and left internal mammary artery. Increasing concentrations of PD155080 caused a progressive, parallel rightward shift of the ET-1 concentration-response curve without detrimental effect on the maximal response to ET-1. The pA2 values determined by Schild analysis were 6.87 in coronary artery (n = 5), 6.75 in saphenous vein (n = 7), and 7.25 in mammary artery (n = 6). Slopes of the Schild regression lines were not significantly different from one, indicating a competitive mode of action. In addition, PD155080 (1 microM) fully reversed the established contraction to ET-1 (30 nM) in saphenous vein. The potency of this compound is comparable to that reported for the ETA-selective peptide antagonist BQ123 [cyclo(D-Trp-L-Asp-L-Pro-D-Val-L-Leu)], which is effective in limiting tissue damage caused by ET-1 in animal models of pathologic vasospasm. PD155080 may therefore be a good candidate for clinical use in diseases, such as subarachnoid hemorrhage, in which the ET system is implicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maguire et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: