Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Government may provide a good that can, if legally permitted, be supplemented by private purchases. Policy is determined by majority rule. Under standard assumptions on preferences, a majority voting equilibrium exists. A regime of positive government provision with no restriction on private supplements is shown to be majority preferred to a regime of either only market provision or only government provision. Combined public and private expenditure on the good is higher under this dual-provision regime than under either of the alternatives. Under some preference configurations, the median-income voter is pivotal; under others, a voter with income below the median is pivotal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Epple et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: