This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) commonly reactivates after stem-cell transplantation (SCT), despite acyclovir prophylaxis. Whether HSV-seropositive recipients with HSV-seronegative or type-discordant donors had more frequent and severe HSV infections than those with HSV type-concordant donors was explored. Banked serum samples from HSV-positive SCT recipients and their donors were tested for the presence of HSV antibodies. HSV-1-positive SCT recipients from HSV-1-negative donors had more frequent and longer episodes than HSV-1-positive SCT recipients from HSV-1-positive donors; the proportion of patients receiving antiviral treatment for >10% of follow-up days was 27.4% versus 7.2% (P<.001). Both HSV-1 visceral infection (9.8% vs. 2.2%; P=.001) and acyclovir resistance (5.8% vs. 1.8%; P=.03) were more common in type-discordant than -concordant patients, respectively; these associations were confirmed in multivariable models. Serological testing of donors can identify patients who are at highest risk for HSV-related morbidity, for whom prolonged prophylaxis or donor vaccination (once available) could be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nichols et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: