Why the study?
Does endothelial lipase inactivation prevent atherosclerosis development in hyperlipidemic atherosclerosis-prone mouse models?
Does endothelial lipase inactivation prevent atherosclerosis development in hyperlipidemic atherosclerosis-prone mouse models?
Endothelial lipase inactivation increases HDL-C but does not reduce atherosclerosis development in hyperlipidemic mouse models, potentially due to attenuated ABCA1 expression in macrophages.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
EL inactivation does not reduce atherosclerosis despite higher HDL-C in mice; leaves open translation to humans and macrophage ABCA1 effects.
Endothelial lipase (EL) is a determinant of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) level, which is negatively correlated with atherosclerosis susceptibility. We found no difference in aortic atherosclerotic lesion areas between 26-week-old EL+/+ apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE-/-) and EL-/- apoE-/- mice. To more firmly establish the role of EL in atherosclerosis, we extended our study to EL-/- and EL+/+ low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient (LDLR-/-) mice that were fed a Western diet. Morphometric analysis again revealed no difference in atherosclerosis lesion area between the two groups. Compared with EL+/+ mice, we found increased HDL-C in EL-/- mice with apoE-/- or LDLR-/- background but no difference in macrophage content between lesions of EL-/- and EL+/+ mice in apoE-/- or LDLR-/- background. EL inactivation had no effect on hepatic mRNAs of proteins involved in reverse cholesterol transport. A survey of lipid homeostasis in EL+/+ and EL-/- macrophages revealed that oxidized LDL-induced ABCA1 was attenuated in EL-/- macrophages. This potentially proatherogenic change may have nullified any minor protective increase of HDL in EL-/- mice. Thus, although EL modulated lipoprotein profile in mice, there was no effect of EL inactivation on atherosclerosis development in two hyperlipidemic atherosclerosis-prone mouse models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ko et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: