Distinct classes of sympathetic preganglionic neurones (muscle vs. cutaneous vasoconstrictor-like) possess different intrinsic electrophysiological properties that likely shape specific sympathetic outflows in cardiorespiratory reflex integration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SPN subtype differences may enable targeted sympathetic responses; leaves open their contribution to human cardiovascular reflexes.
Key points Sympathetic preganglionic neurones (SPNs) gatekeep the activity flowing from the CNS to the periphery and their intrinsic properties are believed to play an important integrative role in determining the firing patterns. Previous cell recording studies have explored the electrophysiological characteristics of SPNs but until now it has not been possible to link this knowledge to their roles in cardiorespiratory integration. We used the working heart–brainstem preparation to make whole‐cell patch clamp recordings from thoracic SPNs ( n = 98). The SPNs were classified into muscle vasoconstrictor‐like (MVC like , 39%) and cutaneous vasoconstrictor‐like (CVC like , 28%) on the basis of their dichotomous responses to cardiorespiratory reflex activation. The MVC like SPNs have higher baseline firing frequencies and distinctive intrinsic properties. Their firing is driven by a barrage of excitatory synaptic potentials with both tonic and respiratory modulated components. The CVC like SPNs show stereotyped rhythmical membrane potential oscillations that underpin their action potential discharge. We propose that these striking differences in the intrinsic properties of the classes of SPNs are likely to play an important role in patterning the sympathetic outflow. Abstract Sympathetic preganglionic neurones (SPNs) convey sympathetic activity flowing from the CNS to the periphery to reach the target organs. Although previous in vivo and in vitro cell recording studies have explored their electrophysiological characteristics, it has not been possible to relate these characteristics to their roles in cardiorespiratory reflex integration. We used the working heart–brainstem preparation to make whole cell patch clamp recordings from T3–4 SPNs ( n = 98). These SPNs were classified by their distinct responses to activation of the peripheral chemoreflex, diving response and arterial baroreflex, allowing the discrimination of muscle vasoconstrictor‐like (MVC like , 39%) from cutaneous vasoconstrictor‐like (CVC like , 28%) SPNs. The MVC like SPNs have higher baseline firing frequencies (2.52 ± 0.33 Hz vs . CVC like 1.34 ± 0.17 Hz, P = 0.007). The CVC like have longer after‐hyperpolarisations (314 ± 36 ms vs . MVC like 191 ± 13 ms, P < 0.001) and lower input resistance (346 ± 49 MΩ vs . MVC like 496 ± 41 MΩ, P < 0.05). MVC like firing was respiratory‐modulated with peak discharge in the late inspiratory/early expiratory phase and this activity was generated by both a tonic and respiratory‐modulated barrage of synaptic events that were blocked by intrathecal kynurenate. In contrast, the activity of CVC like SPNs was underpinned by rhythmical membrane potential oscillations suggestive of gap junctional coupling. Thus, we have related the intrinsic electrophysiological properties of two classes of SPNs in situ to their roles in cardiorespiratory reflex integration and have shown that they deploy different cellular mechanisms that are likely to influence how they integrate and shape the distinctive sympathetic outputs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stalbovskiy et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: