Why the study?
Does radionuclide angiography improve the diagnostic probability of significant coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain?
Does radionuclide angiography improve the diagnostic probability of significant coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain?
Radionuclide angiography parameters improve the diagnostic probability of coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain, though many with low or intermediate pretest probability will still require further testing.
May allow high-probability CAD diagnosis in one-third of patients; hypothesis-generating and requires larger prospective validation.
We applied logistic regression analysis to a group of 736 patients with chest pain to determine which radionuclide angiographic (RNA) parameters were most useful in the diagnosis of significant coronary artery disease. The most useful parameters were exercise ejection fraction, exercise heart rate, "ischemia score," and the presence of a regional wall motion abnormality at exercise. Ten clinical variables were used in one logistic regression model to estimate each patient's pretest probability of disease. A second logistic regression model considered these clinical variables and the four important RNA parameters to estimate each patient's posttest probability. These models were applied prospectively to a group of 76 patients with chest pain who did not have a high pretest probability of disease. Twenty-four patients (32%) could be diagnosed with 90% probability; 32 patients (42%) could be diagnosed with 85% probability. RNA testing is therefore helpful in the noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease. However, a majority of patients who do have a low or intermediate pretest probability of disease will require additional testing for a definitive diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gibbons et al. (1983) studied this question.