Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Significance: A shortcoming of the routine clinical use of diffuse optics (DO) in the injured head has been that the results from commercial near-infrared spectroscopy-based devices are not reproducible, often give physiologically invalid values, and differ among systems. Besides the limitations due to the physics of continuous-wave light sources, one culprit is the head heterogeneity and the underlying morphological and functional abnormalities of the probed tissue. Aim: The aim is to investigate the effect that different tissue alterations in the damaged head have on DO signals and provide guidelines to avoid data misinterpretation. Approach: DO measurements and computed tomography scans were acquired on brain-injured patients. The relationship between the signals and the underlying tissue types was classified on a case-by-case basis. Results: Examples and suggestions to establish quality control routines were provided. The findings suggested guidelines for carrying out DO measurements and speculations toward improved devices. Conclusions: quality control routines that go beyond an assessment of the signal-to-noise ratio that is typically utilized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tagliabue et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: