Why the study?
Does the degree of energy compensation affect changes in VO2max and non-exercise physical activity after 4 weeks of interval training in healthy young adults?
Does the degree of energy compensation affect changes in VO2max and non-exercise physical activity after 4 weeks of interval training in healthy young adults?
Considerable individual variation exists in energy compensation following short-term interval training, with lower compensation associated with greater improvements in VO2max and non-exercise physical activity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Substantial inter-individual variation in energy compensation to short-term interval training; leaves open predictors and dose-response for weight outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Many individuals lose less weight than expected in response to exercise interventions when considering the increased energy expenditure of exercise (ExEE). This is due to energy compensation in response to ExEE, which may include increases in energy intake (EI) and decreases in non-exercise physical activity (NEPA). We examined the degree of energy compensation in healthy young men and women in response to interval training. METHODS: Data were examined from a prior study in which 24 participants (mean age, BMI, & VO2max = 28 yrs, 27.7 kg•m-2, and 32 mL∙kg-1∙min-1) completed either 4 weeks of sprint-interval training or high-intensity interval training. Energy compensation was calculated from changes in body composition (air displacement plethysmography) and exercise energy expenditure was calculated from mean heart rate based on the heart rate-VO2 relationship. Differences between high (≥ 100%) and low (< 100%) levels of energy compensation were assessed. Linear regressions were utilized to determine associations between energy compensation and ΔVO2max, ΔEI, ΔNEPA, and Δresting metabolic rate. RESULTS: Very large individual differences in energy compensation were noted. In comparison to individuals with low levels of compensation, individuals with high levels of energy compensation gained fat mass, lost fat-free mass, and had lower change scores for VO2max and NEPA. Linear regression results indicated that lower levels of energy compensation were associated with increases in ΔVO2max (p < 0.001) and ΔNEPA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation exists in response to short-term, low dose interval training. In agreement with prior work, increases in ΔVO2max and ΔNEPA were associated with lower energy compensation. Future studies should focus on identifying if a dose-response relationship for energy compensation exists in response to interval training, and what underlying mechanisms and participant traits contribute to the large variation between individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schubert et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: