Why the study?
International OHCA guidelines use puberty to differentiate paediatric and adult care, but no study had compared the characteristics and outcomes of non-pubescent children, adolescents, and adults.
Does the puberty threshold appropriately differentiate characteristics and outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients?
Does the puberty threshold appropriately differentiate characteristics and outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients?
The use of puberty as a threshold to differentiate pediatric and adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care is supported by significant differences in etiology and initial rhythm between children and adolescents.
Supports retaining puberty threshold in OHCA guidelines; observational data confirm adolescents align with adults rather than children.
BACKGROUND: Since 2005, the international guidelines for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) use puberty to differentiate paediatric and adult care. This threshold is mainly relied on the more frequent respiratory aetiologies in children. Hitherto, to the best of our knowledge, no study has compared the characteristics and outcomes of non-pubescent children, adolescents and adult patients with OHCA. In this study, we intended to describe the characteristics, outcome and factors associated with survival of patients who experienced OHCA in the three groups: children, adolescents (pubescent<18 years) and adults (<65 years), to assess the pertinence of the guidelines. METHODS: Data from the French national cardiac arrest registry (2012-2017) were used in this nationwide observational study. Victims of OHCA who were <65 years old were included. The characteristics and outcomes of children and adolescents, and adolescents and adults were compared. Logistic regression was performed in each group to identify factors associated with survival at day 30. RESULTS: We included 934 children, 433 adolescents and 26 952 adults. Respiratory aetiology was more frequent and shockable rhythm less frequent in children compared with adolescents (25.5% vs 17.2%, p=0.025 and 2.4% vs 6.8%, p<0.001, respectively). However, these differences were not observed between adolescents and adults (17.2% vs 14.1%, p=0.266 and 6.8% vs 10%, p=0.055, respectively). Between children and adolescents, and adolescents and adults, there was no significant difference in survival at day 30 (8.6%vs 9.8% and 9.8% vs 8.5%, respectively). For all groups, shockable initial rhythm was a factor of survival. CONCLUSION: Frequency of respiratory aetiologies and shockable rhythm were common in adolescents and adults and different between children and adolescents. These results indicate that puberty as a threshold in international guidelines seems to be relevant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Privat et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: