Why the study?
Most premature cardiovascular mortality occurs in low- and middle-income countries, driven primarily by hypertension, diabetes, and smoking.
Does behavioral change communication through community health workers improve systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and smoking rates in adults with cardiovascular risk factors?
Does behavioral change communication through community health workers improve systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and smoking rates in adults with cardiovascular risk factors?
A community health worker-based approach using behavioral change communication significantly improved systolic blood pressure control but not glycemic control or smoking cessation in a low-resource setting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CHW-led integrated care improves hypertension control in LMICs; extends single-risk-factor CHW evidence to multicondition management.
BACKGROUND: Eighty percent of premature mortality from cardiovascular disease occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Hypertension, diabetes, and smoking are the top risk factors causing this disease burden. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to test the hypothesis that utilizing community health workers (CHWs) to manage hypertension, diabetes and smoking in an integrated manner would lead to improved control of these conditions. METHODS: This was a 2-year cluster (n = 12) randomized controlled trial of 3,556 adults (35 to 70 years of age) in a single town in India, who were screened at home for hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. Of these adults, 1,242 (35%) had at least 1 risk factor (hypertension = 650, diabetes = 317, smoking = 500) and were enrolled in the study. The intervention group had behavioral change communication through regular home visits from community health workers. The control group received usual care in the community. The primary outcomes were changes in systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and average number of cigarettes/bidis smoked daily among individuals with respective risk factors. RESULTS: The mean ± SD change in systolic blood pressure at 2 years was -12.2 ± 19.5 mm Hg in the intervention group as compared with -6.4 ± 26.1 mm Hg in the control group, resulting in an adjusted difference of -8.9 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.5 to -14.4 mm Hg; p = 0.001). The change in fasting blood glucose was -43.0 ± 83.5 mg/dl in the intervention group and -16.3 ± 77.2 mg/dl in the control group, leading to an adjusted difference of -21.3 mg/dl (95% CI: 18.4 to -61 mg/dl; p = 0.29). The change in mean number of cigarettes/bidis smoked was nonsignificant at +0.2 cigarettes/bidis (95% CI: 5.6 to -5.2 cigarettes/bidis; p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: A population-based strategy of integrated risk factor management through community health workers led to improved systolic blood pressure in hypertension, an inconclusive effect on fasting blood glucose in diabetes, and no demonstrable effect on smoking. (Study of a Community-Based Approach to Control Cardiovascular Risk Factors in India [SEHAT]; NCT02115711).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khetan et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: