Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BackgroundThe association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and lung cancer risk remains controversial. Here, we used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to test the causal relationship between EBV and lung cancer.MethodsData regarding lung cancer (outcomes) were collected from the Finnish database; the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) summary-level dataset for EBV was obtained from the Open Forum Infect Dis. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as a primary analytical approach; weighted median, MR-Egger, and weighted mode methods were used to ensure the robustness of the data. The MR-Egger regression assessed horizontal pleiotropy, and the MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) method identified potential outliers. Cochran's Q test evaluated heterogeneity among instrumental variables (IVs).ResultsIVW analysis indicated several significant causal effects. Genetically elevated levels of EBV ZEBRA and EBNA-1 antibodies increased the risk of SQC (OR=1.26 and OR=1.33, respectively). Increased EBNA-1 antibodies also raised the risk of overall lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. Conversely, higher VCA p18 antibody levels were associated with a decreased risk of lung adenocarcinoma (OR=0.70). Sensitivity analyses suggested these findings were robust, with no significant evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity.ConclusionOur data suggests a causal effect between EBV and the progression of lung cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: