Why the study?
Does transvenous atrial pacing from the SVC stump provide adequate pacing and sensing in patients after a hemi-Fontan procedure?
Does transvenous atrial pacing from the SVC stump provide adequate pacing and sensing in patients after a hemi-Fontan procedure?
Transvenous atrial pacing from the SVC stump is a feasible and effective alternative to epicardial leads in patients after a hemi-Fontan operation.
SVC stump pacing may be feasible post-hemi-Fontan; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before adoption.
BACKGROUND: The placement of a standard endocardial pacemaker system is challenging after a superior cavopulmonary connection (hemi-Fontan operation or Glenn shunt) as the continuity between the superior vena cava (SVC) and right atrium is divided. The standard transvenous approach for endocardial lead placement has therefore in general been avoided, and epicardial leads have been placed. METHODS: In three patients after a hemi-Fontan procedure, we found viable atrial tissue in the SVC stump of the superior cavopulmonary anastomosis, which was still connected electrically to the right atrium into which active-fixation leads could be safely implanted. RESULTS: There was excellent short- and long-term atrial pacing and sensing characteristics in the SVC stump. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a technique for transvenous pacing in patients after the hemi-Fontan procedure using the conventional subclavian vein approach and pectoral placement of the generator. For ventricular pacing, it was possible to cross the patch dividing the right atrium from the SVC either using a spontaneous leak or by needle puncture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenthal et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: