Why the study?
What are the complication rates and survival outcomes associated with epicardial pacemakers in dogs and cats?
What are the complication rates and survival outcomes associated with epicardial pacemakers in dogs and cats?
Epicardial pacemaker implantation is a viable alternative to transvenous pacing in veterinary patients, though larger dogs (>10 kg) face a higher risk of major complications.
May warrant size-specific monitoring in canine epicardial pacing; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To report signalment, history, indications, complications and outcome for 28 dogs and 5 cats in which 34 permanent epicardial pacing leads were surgically placed by transdiaphragmatic approach (32) or intercostal thoracotomy (2). METHODS: Medical records (2005-2010) were reviewed. Signalment, age, species, gender, clinical signs, presence of structural heart disease and/or congestive heart failure, ECG diagnosis, body weight (<10 or >10 kg), and overall survival rate were recorded. Statistical correlations were made between these variables and major and minor complications rates. RESULTS: Except for body weight, no statistical differences were identified in prevalence of major (life threatening or requiring replacement of the pacemaker system) or minor (self-limiting) complications; dogs weighing >10 kg had significantly more major complications (P = .03). There was a trend (P = .051) for lower survival in animals that had major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Larger dogs (>10 kg) may be predisposed to more major complications with epicardial pacemaker (EP) implantation. Major complication rate and survival time are similar to those reported for transvenous pacing and therefore implantation of EPs remains a suitable alternative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Visser et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: