Why the study?
Does the measurement of ejection time at exercise-induced heart rates distinguish between trained athletes, normal sedentary subjects, and patients with anginal ischemic heart disease?
Does the measurement of ejection time at exercise-induced heart rates distinguish between trained athletes, normal sedentary subjects, and patients with anginal ischemic heart disease?
The measurement of ejection time during exercise-induced heart rate increases does not reliably distinguish between normal subjects, trained athletes, and patients with ischemic heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ejection time-heart rate relationship during exercise does not distinguish groups; leaves open its diagnostic utility in ischemic heart disease.
The relationship of ejection time to heart rate was examined in 19 ath-letes, 21 sedentary normal subjects and 19 patients with anginal ischemic heart disease.Exercise tests were performed using the step test, the bicycle ergometer and the treadmill. Regression analysis was applied to the data by regressing ET on HR and delta ET on delta HR.No significant differences were demonstrated between these groups even though the coronary insufficient patients manifested ischemic S-T segment changes and angina. Slight differences existed between the normal and is-chemic groups when the delta ET-delta HR relationship was examined, but the variance of the data challenged the significance.The data indicated that at any level of heart rate induced by exercise, the measurement of ejection time will not distinguish between trained athletes, normal sedentary subjects or coronary insufficient patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agress et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: