Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The relation between diet and breast cancer was examined in a population-based case-control study conducted in Adelaide, South Australia, involving 451 case-control pairs aged 20-74 years. Cases were identified through the state cancer registry between April 1982 and July 1984; for each case, one age-matched control was selected from the electoral register. Dietary intake was measured by self-administered quantitative food frequency questionnaires. There was little variation in risk across levels of daily intake of energy, protein, and total fat; for energy, the relative risk of breast cancer at the uppermost fifth of intake, relative to a risk of unity for the lowest fifth, was 1.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.86); for protein, the corresponding relative risk was 1.09 (95% CI 0.72-1.64), and for total fat, the relative risk was 0.90 (95% CI 0.59-1.38). Variation in risk in association with sugar and starch intake was also insubstantial, while for fiber, there was a nonuniform reduction in risk at the three uppermost fifths of intake. Risk varied little with level of retinol intake, but it decreased with increasing intake of beta-carotene, a trend that was statistically significant; the relative risk of breast cancer at the uppermost fifth of beta-carotene intake was 0.76 (95% CI 0.50-1.18). Multivariate adjustment for the effects of potentially confounding variables did not alter these patterns. The study does not support a role for dietary fat in the etiology of breast cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rohan et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: