Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, Susan Lytle and Marilyn Cochran-Smith, two university-based teacher educators, argue for a different theory of knowledge for teaching — one that is drawn from the systematic inquiry of teachers themselves. In contrast to a knowledge base for teaching that privileges only the knowledge of the university researcher, the authors propose a knowledge base that includes the emic perspective of the teacher researcher,whose questions and processes are embedded in classroom practice. In their analysis,the authors draw on a wide range of texts written by teachers, including journals,essays, oral inquiries, and classroom studies. Lytle and Cochran-Smith conclude that teacher research, which historically has been marginalized in the field, challenges the assumption that knowledge for teaching is generated by outsiders only; they argue,rather, that school-based teacher researchers are themselves knowers and a primary source of generating knowledge about teaching and learning for themselves and others.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lytle et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: