Why the study?
The study aimed to develop a PK/PD model describing the relationship between exposure to the dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist cotadutide and responses in UACR, UALB, and body weight in patients with CKD and T2DM.
Does cotadutide reduce UACR, UALB, and body weight in patients with CKD and T2DM?
Does cotadutide reduce UACR, UALB, and body weight in patients with CKD and T2DM?
Cotadutide exposure is significantly associated with dose-dependent reductions in UACR, UALB, and body weight in patients with CKD and T2DM.
Model supports cotadutide exposure-response for UACR reduction; extends Phase 2b RCT data for dose selection in diabetic CKD.
AIMS: Cotadutide is a dual glucagon-like peptide-1/glucagon receptor agonist. The objective of the analysis was to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to describe the relationship between cotadutide exposure and response on urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), urinary albumin (UALB), and body weight in participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using data from a Phase2b study (NCT04515849). METHODS: A total of 247 participants with CKD and T2DM were randomized and titrated to either 100, 300 or 600 μg cotadutide, 1 mg semaglutide or placebo. UACR was measured biweekly from either morning void (Weeks 14 and 26) or spot urine (other visits). The analysis was implemented using a longitudinal non-linear mixed-effect model. The potential impact of covariates on efficacy in participants was quantified. RESULTS: PK/PD models were developed, and a significant relationship was identified between cotadutide exposure and PD biomarkers of UACR, UALB and body weight. The models described the data adequately; greater changes in PD responses were observed with higher cotadutide doses. Baseline mean blood pressure and baseline UALB were found to affect the reductions in UACR and UALB, respectively. Model-predicted relative change from placebo in UACR, UALB and body weight after 26 weeks of 600 μg cotadutide treatment were -45.6% (-52.4%, -38.7%), -47.2% (-56.0%, -39.9%) and -5.3% (-7.6%, -4.1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This modelling assessment was successfully applied for cotadutide to understand the relationship between cotadutide dosing regimen and the response in UACR, UALB and body weight. These models have general application in analysing and interpreting data from CKD/diabetic kidney disease (DKD) studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: