Why the study?
Does Doppler ultrasound provide reliable arm and leg blood pressure measurements compared to the Korotkoff sound method in healthy male patients?
Does Doppler ultrasound provide reliable arm and leg blood pressure measurements compared to the Korotkoff sound method in healthy male patients?
Doppler ultrasound provides a reliable method for measuring arm and leg blood pressures with better agreement between opposite limbs than the traditional Korotkoff sound method.
May improve inter-limb BP agreement over auscultation; leaves open its role in routine vascular assessment.
Arm and leg systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured using a Doppler ultrasound technique in fifty-seven healthy male patients. The average upper limb supine blood pressure was 130/80 mm Hg. The average leg systolic pressure was 6.8 mm Hg higher than the average arm systolic pressure. The average diastolic pressure in the leg was 2.1 mm Hg higher than the average arm diastolic pressure. Agreement between pressures in opposite limbs was better than that obtained with the Korotkoff sound method. The only important difference was between supine and erect arm diastolic pressures. Electrocardiographic abnormalities were noted in six subjects; all had mild to moderate hypertension, but no overt cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
W Felix (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: